berries.
01//how label deals work

we do not sell hours.
we sign upside.

a label deal is not a marketing contract. it's a commercial rights agreement over an agreed scope. berries operates the commercial layer. the partner keeps building. both sides share the upside created after we start.

02//what is a label deal

commercial rights over an agreed scope.

berries operates the commercial layer. the partner keeps building the product. both sides share the upside created after berries starts.

scope examples
  • channel
  • geography
  • platform
  • product line
  • app-store presence
  • web funnel
  • category
  • full commercialization
03//deal waterfall

revenue is vanity if the economics break.

we work from contribution profit, because that's where real scale lives. every line is auditable. nothing hidden.

berries // deal waterfall
  1. gross revenue
    all cash collected
  2. refunds + chargebacks + taxes + platform fees
  3. =
    net revenue
  4. ai / api / cloud costs tied to usage
  5. paid media + creative production
  6. creator + affiliate commissions
  7. approved growth tools
  8. =
    contribution profit
  9. partner baseline (protected — not touched)
  10. =
    incremental contribution profit
  11. partner share
    berries share
04//baseline protection

we don't take credit for what already worked.

the partner baseline is protected. we earn from the incremental contribution profit we create after we start operating the commercial layer.

definition
baseline contribution profit

average monthly contribution profit before berries starts. usually based on the trailing three months. set in writing. not contested.

definition
incremental contribution profit

current contribution profit minus baseline contribution profit. only the incremental — never the baseline — is shared.

definition
growth cost recoup

approved direct growth spend (paid media, creative, affiliates, tools) is recouped from contribution profit before any split.

05//baseline → berries lift

aligned economics, visualized.

we protect the baseline. we deduct direct growth costs. we split the incremental contribution profit.

contribution profit →
01
02
03
04
05
06
  • 01before berries
  • 02signed
  • 03label sprint
  • 04signal
  • 05scale
  • 06category hit
06//capital follows proof

first we test. then we co-fund. only winners get aggressive capital.

label sprint
funds
mostly partner
risk
low
upside
25–35%
co-funded scale
funds
shared
risk
medium
upside
40–50%
full label scale
funds
berries or capital partner
risk
high
upside
50–60%
07//commercial control

if we are accountable for outcomes, we need control.

berries is not an agency taking instructions from the sidelines. to create outcomes, we need decision rights over the commercial layer within the agreed scope.

partner owns
  • product
  • engineering
  • ip
  • core roadmap
  • legal / compliance final approval
  • brand-level veto for exceptional cases
berries operates
  • positioning
  • creative
  • paid growth
  • funnels
  • pricing tests within agreed guardrails
  • lifecycle
  • data
  • budget allocation within approved caps

without control, berries becomes an agency. with control, berries becomes the label.

08//stage gates · kill criteria

we scale only when the data says scale.

capital does not move because a founder is excited. capital moves when retention, cac, margin, creative signal, and payback support scale.

gates to pass
  • cac signal
  • retention not broken
  • healthy gross margin
  • creative angle found
  • payback visible
  • team ships fast
  • no major compliance risk
  • commercial control granted
kill criteria
  • cac structurally too high
  • retention weak
  • margin broken
  • no repeatable creative angle
  • founder/team too slow
  • no commercial control
  • compliance / platform risk too high
▸ killed before scale. no emotional attachment.
09//deal simulator

model the deal with your numbers.

change the inputs. outputs recompute live. illustrative — real deals require a data review and are negotiated specific to your product.

berries // founder upside simulator
01//

your app

link · platform · vertical. then we scan.

app store / web url (optional)
platform
vertical
02//

what you need

pick how the money flows. then we'll do the math.

we put capital in alongside you.

55% you · 45% berries

we co-fund the growth budget — typically 50/50 — and operate the commercial machine. you spend less out-of-pocket. closer to a partnership than a service. the math reflects that with a more balanced split.

03//

your numbers

real numbers · nothing leaves this screen.

measured at

when the cohort matures to this return. day-30 = early view, can be misleading. year-1+ = mature view, what we underwrite against.

✓ fit · ready

healthy payback — €1 in → €1.50 out. the deal pencils on any model.

04//

deal capital

you set what you put in. you set what you ask from berries.

split: 50% you · 50% berriestotal €40k/mo
you / month
€20k
berries / month
€20k
total annual
€480k
05//

projections · 12 months

tuned to ai tools · productivity · mobile app. here's what you actually take home.

expected · 12-month outcome
€272k
+€152k vs. going alone
+127% on your baseline of €120k
month 1- - - baselinemonth 12
the range · 12-month scenarios
without berries
€120k
without berries: €120k.
conservative
€143k
+€23k on baseline+19%
conservative: €143k, €23k vs baseline, +19%.
expectedtypical case
€272k
+€152k on baseline+127%
expected: €272k, €152k vs baseline, +127%.
ambitious
€430k
+€310k on baseline+258%
ambitious: €430k, €310k vs baseline, +258%.
what makes up your take · expected case
under co-funded
your baseline
what you'd take without any deal
€120k
+ cash freed up
growth spend you no longer pay
€0
+ your share of the new lift
incremental contribution profit, your share after recoup
€152k
= your total
€272k
deal economics · berries side
investor view

berries fronts €240k of growth capital. recouped first from the incremental; remainder splits per the model. capital at risk.

conservative
recouped€240k
share€19k
total€259k
moic1.08×
marginal
expected
recouped€240k
share€124k
total€364k
moic1.52×
fit
ambitious
recouped€240k
share€254k
total€494k
moic2.06×
strong fit

✓ strong fit for berries — capital deployed at attractive multiples.

*recoup first. growth capital comes off the top before the split applies.
*baseline protected. your pre-berries revenue is never clawed back.
*term · 24 months. minimum engagement so the math has time to work.
*data review. real deals require diligence and a signed agreement.
illustrative · linear-ramp model with 12-month view · 1.0× recoup, no preferred return · your category and execution will vary.
10//faq

the questions we get every week.

are you an agency?

no. agencies sell services. berries signs products and earns from the upside created through the commercial layer.

do you take equity?

not by default. most label deals are based on incremental contribution profit. some strategic deals may include equity, warrants, investment rights, or deeper commercial structures.

who pays for media?

it depends on stage and proof. the first sprint is usually partner-funded. berries can co-fund or fully fund distribution after the product shows signal.

do we keep our product?

yes. the default label deal is not an acquisition. the partner keeps building the product. berries commercializes the agreed scope.

can we hire berries just for ads?

no. berries is not a paid media agency. we only work when we can operate the commercial system properly.

what if the sprint fails?

we stop, learn, and do not force scale. the model only works if we kill weak opportunities quickly.

what products do you reject?

ideas, thin wrappers, weak-margin products, slow teams, products without demand signals, and founders who want agency execution without shared control.

how long is a label sprint?

60–90 days. enough time to test creative, channels, monetization, and funnel without spiraling capital into a product that isn't ready.

think your product has the signal?

we read every submission. we reply with a verdict.